One prompt starts a council, not an autocomplete. Forge moves through discovery, grounded
research, synthesis, and section-by-section drafting. Then every enabled agent audits
the whole deliverable against the user's core ask. Any dissent triggers a complete
revision and another independent vote.
01
Question
Agents challenge the offer, audience, proof, tone, constraints, and desired action before anyone writes finished copy.
02
Draft
Each required section is written from the shared synthesis and grounded research—not invented features or plausible-sounding filler.
03
Attack
Every reviewer independently hunts generic AI cadence, unsupported claims, prompt drift, weak persuasion, contradictions, and disconnected CTAs.
04
Revise
One blocker is enough. The complete deliverable is rewritten around the objections, then every agent votes again.
05
Prove
The final copy returns only after unanimous approval at 85+ alignment. Headless runs persist every verdict in critical-review.md; Codex keeps its delegated review trace in-session. No agreement means no fake “final.”
Use it in the surface already open: ask naturally from Claude Code or Codex
through the Forge plugin, enable the automatic consensus run in the Electron app, or run it
from the terminal. Claude, Electron, and terminal use Forge's phase engine; Codex uses the
same fail-closed contract through its native host subagents so it never has to launch itself recursively.