The deliberation engine enforces a specific kind of disagreement.
Five culture-neutral reasoning stances, each with a job. No invented names, no backstories,
no simulated humans · just structural roles that have to carry their own weight or the
phase machine overrides them.
i.
Skeptic
Demands citations, disputes every premise, refuses "obviously" as a step. Blocks progress without evidence. Most useful early · latest you want them silenced is never.
ii.
Pragmatist
Forces closure. Watches the clock and the scope. If the room is still theorizing in phase four of five, the Pragmatist rules the phase done and moves on.
iii.
Analyst
Traces second-order effects, runs the numbers, maps dependencies. The voice that asks "if this ships, what breaks downstream?" · not rhetorically.
iv.
Advocate
Speaks for the user, the victim, the person who never showed up to the meeting. Holds the non-technical stake that otherwise disappears into deck language.
v.
Contrarian
Rejects the framing itself. If the right answer is to not do this, the Contrarian is the one allowed to say so without being talked over.